Skip to main content
[RADICAL CANDOR] Β· EVIDENCE INTEGRITY

Case Studies

DISCLOSURE

This page is deliberately empty right now

We're a newer company. We don't yet have a portfolio of completed client engagements with signed permission to publish results, and we're not going to fill this page with invented numbers or anonymised β€œa client in the finance sector saw 340% growth” claims that nobody can verify.

That's not modesty β€” fabricated performance claims are actionable under FTC rules in the US, ASA guidance in the UK, and Australian Consumer Law, and beyond the legal exposure, they're exactly the pattern we've criticised elsewhere on this site.

VERIFIABLE ALTERNATIVES

What we publish instead

VERIFIABLE PROOF 01

Public teardowns

We audit a real, publicly accessible website every month and publish the complete finding, including what we would deliberately leave alone. You can check our reasoning against the actual site yourself, which is more than a case study lets you do.

VERIFIABLE PROOF 02

Our full method

The exact process we run, published before you've paid us anything.

VERIFIABLE PROOF 03

Original research

With methodology stated and sourcing distinguished from our own opinions.

What will appear here

As client engagements complete and clients grant written permission, real case studies with real numbers and named businesses. Every one will state the timeframe, the starting position, and what else was happening commercially β€” because a traffic graph without that context tells you very little.

Frequently asked questions

Inspect Real Thinking

Read our public site teardowns or request a diagnostic review for your site.